Outcomes associated with court-ordered treatment over objection in an acute psychiatric hospital.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The postdischarge outcomes of court-ordered treatment of acute psychiatric inpatients have not been adequately investigated. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who refused medication for whom a court order was sought during a recent three-year period, and compared this group to control patients who agreed to treatment and a group of patients who transiently refused medication. The principal outcome measures were successful linkage after discharge, readmission within six months of discharge, and transfer to a state hospital. The study group was less likely to link to an aftercare provider, and more likely to be transferred to a state hospital, had poorer insight on admission, had a longer average stay, and was more likely to utilize mandatory outpatient treatment and long-acting injectable medications after discharge. Patients who require court-ordered medication over objection constitute a group that is high risk for nonadherence after discharge and being refractive to treatment.
منابع مشابه
Assessing outcomes for consumers in New York's assisted outpatient treatment program.
OBJECTIVE This study examined whether New York State's assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) program, a form of involuntary outpatient commitment, improves a range of policy-relevant outcomes for court-ordered individuals. METHODS Administrative data from New York State's Office of Mental Health and Medicaid claims between 1999 and 2007 were linked to examine whether consumers under a court ord...
متن کاملChanges to the financial responsibility for juvenile court ordered psychiatric evaluations reduce inpatient services utilization: an interrupted time series study
BACKGROUND The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the impact of a July 2008 Tennessee Court of Appeals opinion that shifted financial responsibility for juvenile court ordered psychiatric evaluations from the State to the County. METHODS We used de-identified administrative data from the Tennessee Department of Mental Health and mid-year population estimates from the U.S. Census Bur...
متن کاملAdolescent separation-individuation and the court.
Psychiatric hospital staffs have long been wary of involvement with court proceedings. Issues such as civil commitment and conservatorship all too often result in bitter struggles pitting patient against therapeutic team, with the court as final arbiter. The patient perceives himself fighting for his freedom, while the staffis in the uncomfortable position of having to defend its legitimacy as ...
متن کاملPatients' subjective initial response and the outcome of inpatient and day hospital treatment.
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to establish whether psychiatric patients' subjective initial response (SIR) to hospital and day hospital treatment predicts outcomes over a one-year follow-up period. METHOD We analysed data from 765 patients who were randomised to acute psychiatric treatment in a hospital or day hospital. SIR was assessed on day 3 after admission. Outcomes were psychiatric symptom...
متن کاملComparison of outcomes of acute care in short-term residential treatment and psychiatric hospital settings.
OBJECTIVE The study compared the demographic and diagnostic characteristics of clients and the outcomes of treatment in five short-term acute residential treatment programs and two acute hospital-based psychiatric programs. METHODS A total of 368 clients in the short-term acute residential treatment programs and 186 clients in the psychiatric hospital programs participated in an observational...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 41 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013